Automated user interface analysis

ABSTRACT

Disclosed embodiments provide automated techniques for evaluation of a user interface of a computer application. A computer function associated with a graphical element such as an icon or button is analyzed. The resultant text that appears as a result of invoking the button is analyzed and keywords are identified to determine a function type for the function. A graphical element category is determined for the button/icon that is invoked to produce the function. The graphical element category can be determined by analyzing underlying markup code for the button. Keywords pertaining to the button may be extracted from the markup code. The keywords from the button are compared with the keywords of the resulting function and a score is generated based on the amount of common keywords. The score is used as a criterion for a recommendation about the appropriateness of the button for use with the application function.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to automated user interfaceanalysis.

BACKGROUND

In some enterprises, there can be a great many divisions, departments,offices, and employees. Policies may be put into place in an effort tokeep things consistent across such lines. However, sometimes a personmay miss a certain policy or choose not to follow it. In terms of userinterfaces, inconsistency in how icons or other items are used acrossproducts has the potential to cause consumer confusion, and evenconfusion internally. There exists a need for improvements in userinterface analysis.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, there is provided a computer-implemented method for userinterface evaluation, comprising: analyzing a computer program functionassociated with a graphical element; determining a function type for thefunction; determining a graphical element category for the graphicalelement; performing a consistency check between the graphical elementcategory and the function type; and providing a recommendation reportregarding the use of the graphical element, based on the consistencycheck.

In another aspect, there is provided an electronic device for userinterface evaluation comprising: a processor; a memory coupled to theprocessor, the memory containing instructions, that when executed by theprocessor, perform the steps of: analyzing a computer program functionassociated with a graphical element; determining a function type for thefunction; determining a graphical element category for the graphicalelement; performing a consistency check between the graphical elementcategory and the function type; and providing a recommendation reportregarding the use of the graphical element, based on the consistencycheck.

In yet another aspect, there is provided a computer program product forperforming user interface evaluation on an electronic computing device,the electronic computing device comprising a computer readable storagemedium having program instructions embodied therewith, the programinstructions executable by a processor to cause the electronic computingdevice to: analyze a computer program function associated with agraphical element; determine a function type for the function; determinea graphical element category for the graphical element; perform aconsistency check between the graphical element category and thefunction type; and output a recommendation report regarding the use ofthe graphical element, based on the consistency check.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features of the disclosed embodiments will be more readily understoodfrom the following detailed description of the various aspects of theinvention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates an environment in accordance with embodiments of thepresent invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationwith embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 3 shows an example of markup code and an associated user interfacebutton.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationwith embodiments of the present invention including a tooltip.

FIG. 5 shows another example of markup code and an associated userinterface button.

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationafter a first user interface button is selected.

FIG. 7 illustrates keyword analysis of the first user interface buttonand corresponding function keywords.

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationafter a second user interface button is selected.

FIG. 9 illustrates keyword analysis of the second user interface buttonand corresponding function keywords.

FIG. 10 illustrates a portion of an exemplary recommendation reportshowing results for the first button and the second button.

FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationafter a third user interface button is selected.

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationafter a fourth user interface button is selected.

FIG. 13 illustrates another portion of an exemplary recommendationreport showing results for the third button and the fourth button.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart indicating process steps for embodiments of thepresent invention.

FIG. 15 shows additional details of an embodiment of the presentinvention

The drawings are not necessarily to scale. The drawings are merelyrepresentations, not necessarily intended to portray specific parametersof the invention. The drawings are intended to depict only exampleembodiments of the invention, and therefore should not be considered aslimiting in scope. In the drawings, like numbering may represent likeelements. Furthermore, certain elements in some of the figures may beomitted, or illustrated not-to-scale, for illustrative clarity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed embodiments provide automated techniques for evaluation of auser interface of a computer application. A computer function associatedwith a graphical element such as an icon or button is analyzed. Theresultant text that appears as a result of invoking the button isanalyzed and keywords are identified to determine a function type forthe function. For example, if the text contains keywords such as name,address, and occupation, it may be consistent with a user profile entrypage of an application. A graphical element category is determined forthe button/icon that is invoked to produce the function. The graphicalelement category can be determined by analyzing underlying markup codefor the button. Keywords pertaining to the button may be extracted fromthe markup code. Additionally, a computer-implemented image analysis forthe button may be performed to recognize shapes and/or colors used forthe button. These colors and/or shapes may be checked against a databaseof icons. The icons in the database may have associated metadata, suchas keywords indicating intended purpose(s). The keywords from the buttonare compared with the keywords of the resulting function and a score isgenerated based on the amount of common keywords. The score is used as acriterion for a recommendation about the appropriateness of the buttonfor use with the application function. In this way, user interfacedesigns can be evaluated for consistency and clarity, resulting in animproved user/customer experience with the computer application.

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “anembodiment,” “some embodiments”, or similar language means that aparticular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connectionwith the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of thepresent invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,”“in an embodiment,” “in some embodiments”, and similar languagethroughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer tothe same embodiment.

Moreover, the described features, structures, or characteristics of theinvention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or moreembodiments. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art thatvarious modifications and variations can be made to the presentinvention without departing from the spirit and scope and purpose of theinvention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover themodifications and variations of this invention provided they come withinthe scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Reference willnow be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particularembodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of this disclosure.As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” are intended toinclude the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicatesotherwise. Furthermore, the use of the terms “a”, “an”, etc., do notdenote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of atleast one of the referenced items. The term “set” is intended to mean aquantity of at least one. It will be further understood that the terms“comprises” and/or “comprising”, or “includes” and/or “including”, or“has” and/or “having”, when used in this specification, specify thepresence of stated features, regions, integers, steps, operations,elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence oraddition of one or more other features, regions, integers, steps,operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

FIG. 1 illustrates an environment 100 in accordance with embodiments ofthe present invention. User interface evaluation system 102 may be anelectronic device that includes processor 140, memory 142, and storage144. User interface evaluation system 102 is in communication withnetwork 124. Network 124 may be the Internet, a wide area network, alocal area network, a cloud computing network, an intra-enterprisenetwork, or any other suitable network or combination thereof.Application server 108, hosting a website and/or application, and icondatabase 120 is in communication with the network, as well. The icondatabase 120 stores icons and metadata associated with the icons. Anicon is a small graphical element, included as part of a program, thatwhen invoked (e.g., selected, or clicked on), causes the execution of acomputer program function, for example, to run or open a file.

In some embodiments, system 102 performs the following steps: A computerprogram function associated with a graphical element is analyzed. Afunction type for the function is determined. A graphical elementcategory for the graphical element is determined. A consistency checkbetween the graphical element category and the function type isperformed, resulting in a score. A recommendation report regarding theuse of the graphical element is provided. The recommendation report isbased on the consistency check.

In some embodiments, the system 102 performs an analysis of theappropriateness of graphical elements in their context. This may includeanalyzing text that is present on the same screen/display as thegraphical element. The analysis of the text can include natural languageprocessing, entity detection, and/or additional keyword extractiontechniques. The keywords are then compared with keywords that areassociated with the graphical element. The level of commonality betweenthe two sets of keywords can be used as a measure of the appropriatenessof the graphical element for that context.

In some embodiments, system 102 performs the following steps: A computerprogram function associated with a graphical element is analyzed. Afunction type for the function is determined. A graphical elementcategory for the graphical element is determined. A consistency checkbetween the graphical element category and the function type isperformed, resulting in a score. In these embodiments, the system 102can be configured to make automatic corrections instead of, or inaddition to, creation of a recommendation report. Examples can includeswitching in an appropriate icon from the database that provides aconfidence score greater than the configured threshold and conforms tostylistic checks. In embodiments, this may be implemented by triggeringan updated version of markup code to be loaded onto the applicationserver 108. In embodiments, a continuous integration server 132 may bein communication with the user interface evaluation system 102. Inembodiments, the continuous integration server 132 may be implemented asa Jenkins server. The updated markup code can refer to different icons.In this manner, applications can be updated automatically by acomputer-implemented method, thereby reducing the time where theinappropriate icons/graphical elements are displayed.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary program for user interface evaluationwith embodiments of the present invention. Four icons are shown in theexample 200. A first button 202 includes an icon of an outline of aperson and a writing utensil. A second button 204 includes an icon of amap. A third button 206 includes a pattern icon. A fourth button 208includes an icon of a wrench. Section 210 includes informationinstructing the user to select an icon to begin the process. Once abutton is selected/pressed, information is displayed in the area of 210associated with the button.

In some embodiments, determining the function type comprises performinga natural language processing process to identify one or more functionkeywords. Metadata associated with buttons may be used for one or moremachine learning classifiers. The classifiers may include, but are notlimited to, decision trees, naive Bayes classifiers, Maximum Entropyclassifiers, decision trees, and/or support vector machine classifiers.Thus, some embodiments include performing a computerized naturallanguage analysis process by using a naive Bayes classifier. Someembodiments include performing a computerized natural language analysisprocess by using a support vector machine classifier.

Training data is input to a training pipeline, and its output iscompared with verification data. The classifiers may be adjusted untilthe verification data is satisfactorily classified. Once trained, aninput query can be input to the system and compared against theclassified data from the icon database 120. The classified data is inputto a data analysis and rules engine which analyzes various patterns andanti-patterns in the data from the data repository. The input query caninclude, but is not limited to, markup code, tooltip text, etc. Usingmachine learning techniques, the system can improve over time as moreand more icons are analyzed.

FIG. 3 shows a diagram 300 of an example of markup code and anassociated user interface button 202. In some embodiments, determiningthe graphical element category comprises performing a parsing ofassociated markup code. A page's mark-up code can be reviewed todetermine more information about a button (or other item on the page).In the example, the button's markup code at 302 recites, “User Profile”.This is indicative that, when the user selects button 202, it will causethe computer to access the user's User Profile page, which may containinformation about the user.

FIG. 4 illustrates a diagram 400 of an exemplary program for userinterface evaluation with embodiments of the present invention includinga tooltip. Cursor 222 is shown disposed over button 204. This causes atooltip 224 to appear. A tooltip is a message that appears when a cursoris positioned over an icon, image, hyperlink, or other element in agraphical user interface. The tooltip may include information or cluesregarding a button's function. In the example, the text of tooltip 224includes “Set location preferences, route preferences, and map displaypreferences.”

FIG. 5 shows a diagram 500 of another example of markup code and anassociated user interface button 204. In some embodiments, determiningthe graphical element category comprises parsing tooltip text. In theexample, the mark-up code associated with the tooltip text is shown at520. Similarly to FIG. 4, it includes “Set location preferences, routepreferences, and map display preferences.”

FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary diagram 600 of a program for userinterface evaluation after a first user interface button 202 is selectedby a user (or automated program macro). In response to the selection,user interface section 610 is displayed, including fields for userprofile information, such as name, address, age, and occupation. Thissection is a “User Profile” page.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example 700 of keyword analysis of the first userinterface button 202 and corresponding function keywords. Embodimentscan include performing a natural language processing process to identifyone or more function keywords. Embodiments include determining afunction type for the function. This can be based on the detectedfunction keywords. At 704, there is shown a list of the keywordstypically associated with the graphical element category of button 202.These keywords may be manually entered by human coders, and/or derivedfrom associated markup code such as tooltip text. As shown at 706, thereis shown the keywords detected from the program in relation to thebutton (i.e., from section 610 of FIG. 6), indicating function type. Thekeywords were scraped from the graphical user interface of FIG. 6.

Embodiments include performing a consistency check between the graphicalelement category and the function type. In the example shown at FIG. 7,the words, “Profile”, “Name”, “Address”, “Age”, and “Occupation” are inbold at 706 because they match against words existing in the graphicalelement category at 704. The words “User” and “Information” are shown inregular font because they do not have a match in the graphical elementcategory keywords at 704. The use of bold font is exemplary and used forthe purposes of disclosure. It is not meant to be limiting. Any way ofdenoting the match is included within the scope of the invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary program 800 for user interfaceevaluation after a second user interface button 204 is selected. Button204 is selected by the user, as indicated by its bolded outline. Inresponse to its selection, user interface section 810 is displayed.Information displayed in section 810 includes a form for a user to entercolor preferences, pattern preferences, and gradient preferences.Section 810 is a “preferences page”.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example 900 of keyword analysis of the second userinterface button 204 and corresponding graphical element categorykeywords. The graphical element category keywords are detected from FIG.5 in the tooltip text 520 of the markup code. At 904, keywords relatingto maps are detected, including: “location”, “route”, “preferences”, and“map”. At 906, there is shown the function keywords detected from userinterface section 810 of FIG. 8. They include: “color”, “pattern”,“gradient”, and “preferences”. Embodiments include performing aconsistency check between the graphical element category and thefunction type. As indicated by the bold font of function keyword“preferences” at 906, only that function keyword matches a graphicalelement category keyword at 904. The function keywords, “color”,“pattern”, and “gradient” are not part of the graphical elementcategory. As the color, pattern, and gradient selections have littlerelation to functions typically associated with a map icon such as shownin button 204, the button is likely to cause confusion for a user, andhence should be indicated accordingly in the recommendation report.

FIG. 10 illustrates a portion of an exemplary recommendation report 1000showing results for the first button 202 and the second button 204.Embodiments include generating a consistency score based on theconsistency check. In embodiments, the recommendation report 1000includes the consistency score. Thresholds may be set for therecommendation based on the score. In the example, the threshold is setto 65%. If the score is below 65%, then a warning notification isissued. If it is equal to or above 65%, then a pass notification isissued.

With regard to button 202, for the User Profile button evaluation test1002, a pass notification is shown. The score 1006 is 71%. In theexample, the score is calculated by dividing the number of matchingfunction keywords by the total number of function keywords andmultiplying by 100. In the example shown in FIG. 7, there are 5 functionkeywords with matches in the graphical elements keywords. The totalnumber of function keywords is 7. Therefore, 5 is divided by 7, which isequal to 0.71. This number is then multiplied by 100 for a final scoreof 71%. It should be recognized that this method of calculating a scoreis exemplary, and that other methods are included within the scope ofthe invention.

With regard to button 204, for the location button evaluation test 1010,a warning notification is issued. The score 1012 of 25% is well belowthe 65% threshold. In the example, the score is calculated by dividingthe number of matching function keywords by the total number of functionkeywords and multiplying by 100. In the example shown in FIG. 9, thereis one function keyword with a match in the graphical elements keywords.The total number of function keywords is four. So, 1 is divided by 4,which is equal to 0.25. This number is then multiplied by 100 for afinal score of 25%.

In some embodiments, when a warning is issued, there is provided an“override” option on the display in proximity to the warning. Theoverride option is shown here as button 1014. This allows the user toignore the warning, and keep the icon “as is” even though it appears tobe used in an unconventional manner. Embodiments may include acceptingan override instruction from the user, and recording the user override.The override is recorded and over time, through machine learning, theicon may be associated with the graphical element keywords for thefunction. For example, if the warning is overridden three times out offive, the function keyword may be added to the graphical elementkeywords. Thus, embodiments include accepting a user override for arecommendation included in the recommendation report; and recording theuser override. If no override is received, the recommendation isaffirmed, which may also be recorded and used in machine learning.

FIG. 11 illustrates a diagram 1100 of an exemplary program for userinterface evaluation after a third user interface button 206 isselected. In response to the selection, user interface section 1110 isdisplayed, including fields for Object Specification, such as “Enter thelength”, “Enter the width”, and “Enter the weight”. This section is an“Object” page.

FIG. 12 illustrates a diagram 1200 of an exemplary program for userinterface evaluation after a fourth user interface button 208 isselected. In response to the selection, user interface section 1210 isdisplayed, including fields for Diagnostics, such as “Perform networktest”, “Perform frequency response test”, “Perform light test”, and “Setpassword”. This section is a “Diagnostics” page.

FIG. 13 illustrates a portion of an exemplary recommendation report 1300showing results for the third button 206 and the fourth button 208.Embodiments include generating a consistency score based on theconsistency check. In embodiments, the recommendation report 1300includes the consistency score. Thresholds may be set for therecommendation based on the score. In the example, the threshold is setto 51%. If the score is below 51%, then a warning notification isissued. If it is equal to or above 51%, then a pass notification isissued.

With regard to third button 206, for the button evaluation test, awarning notification 1302 is shown. The score is 0%. An “override”option 1304 is provided on the display in proximity to the warning. Theoverride option is shown here as button 1304. This allows the user toignore the warning, and keep the icon “as is” even though it appears tobe unrecognized.

With regard to button 208, for the button evaluation test, a warningnotification 1306 is issued. The score is below the predeterminedthreshold. An override option 1308 is provided on the display inproximity to the warning. In some embodiments, a recommended icon 1310is provided in proximity to the warning. The recommended icon may beselected according to an algorithm which compares graphical elementskeywords with objects in the icon image. In some embodiments, thecurrently used icon 208 may be automatically replaced by the recommendedicon 1310.

Embodiments may include performing a computer-implemented imagerecognition process on the graphical element (icon). Embodiments mayinclude performing a stylistic consistency check of the graphicalelement. An object recognition process is performed on the button iconto identify one or more objects in the image. The object recognitionprocess may perform a variety of image processing techniques such asedge detection, shape detection, clustering, and/or probabilisticclassifiers to determine the icon shape and/or images within the icon.Image metadata is extracted from the received image based on the objectrecognition process.

The object recognition analysis may include performing an edge detectionprocess to determine the outer edges of the objects in the icon. Theicon database (FIG. 2) may include metadata about the stored icons andthe objects therein. For example, the shape of a person's head may bestored in association with a user profile icon (like that of button202). For edge detection, some embodiments may utilize a Canny edgedetector algorithm. Some embodiments may utilize mathematical models,such as a deformable contour model, and/or an active shape model fordetection of the icon image.

In some embodiments, performing an object recognition process furthercomprises using one or more image classifiers. The image classifiers canbe trained using a supervised learning technique.

In the example of FIG. 13, graphical element keywords relating todiagnostics are detected by computerized object recognition analysis andcompared to a database (e.g., database 120 (of FIG. 1)). The databasemay have metadata, including keywords stored in association with iconimages. The gear icon 1310 is determined to be associated with thediagnostics keywords, and is presented on report 1300.

In some embodiments, a stylistic consistency check may further includeperformance of a color analysis. Icon database 120 (FIG. 2) may includeinformation about colors of the icons as well as standard colors used bythe enterprise (e.g., for branding purposes). If the colors blue andyellow are typically used in application icons for a particular companyand yellow is absent from one icon on a user interface, the icon may beflagged for possible editing in the recommendation report, as shown at“Warning II” of 1311. Thus, a stylistic consistency check may beperformed in some embodiments.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart 1400 indicating process steps for embodiments ofthe present invention. At 1450, a program function type is determined.At 1452, a graphical element category is determined. At 1454, aconsistency check is performed. At 1454, a score is generated. At 1456,it is determined whether the score exceeds a threshold. If so, at 1458,a pass recommendation report is issued. If not, at 1460, a warningrecommendation report is issued. If an override instruction is received,then it is recorded at 1462, and proceeds to box 1454. Embodiments mayinclude adjusting the recommendation in response to receiving apredetermined amount of user overrides. The adjusting may be applied ona future user interface analysis. While the aforementioned examplesillustrate analysis of a user interface implemented as a web page on acomputer, embodiments of the present invention may be used to analyzeuser interfaces on mobile devices such as smartphones and/or tabletcomputers.

Referring now to FIG. 15, a computerized implementation 1510 of anembodiment for automated user interface analysis is described in furtherdetail. Computerized implementation 1510 is only one example of asuitable implementation and is not intended to suggest any limitation asto the scope of use or functionality of embodiments of the inventiondescribed herein. Regardless, computerized implementation 1510 iscapable of being implemented and/or performing any of the functionalityset forth hereinabove.

In computerized implementation 1510, there is a computer system 1512.Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/orconfigurations that may be suitable for use with computer system 1512include, but are not limited to, personal computer systems, servercomputer systems, thin clients, thick clients, hand-held or laptopdevices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set topboxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputersystems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computingenvironments that include any of the above systems or devices, and thelike.

This is intended to demonstrate, among other things, that the presentinvention could be implemented within a network environment (e.g., theInternet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), avirtual private network (VPN), etc.), a cloud computing environment, acellular network, or on a stand-alone computer system. Communicationthroughout the network can occur via any combination of various types ofcommunication links. For example, the communication links can compriseaddressable connections that may utilize any combination of wired and/orwireless transmission methods. Where communications occur via theInternet, connectivity could be provided by conventional TCP/IPsockets-based protocol, and an Internet service provider could be usedto establish connectivity to the Internet. Still yet, computer system1512 is intended to demonstrate that some or all of the components ofimplementation 1510 could be deployed, managed, serviced, etc., by aservice provider who offers to implement, deploy, and/or perform thefunctions of the present invention for others.

Computer system 1512 is intended to represent any type of computersystem that may be implemented in deploying/realizing the teachingsrecited herein. Computer system 1512 may be described in the generalcontext of computer system executable instructions, such as programmodules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modulesmay include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, datastructures, and so on, that perform particular tasks or implementparticular abstract data types. In this particular example, computersystem 1512 represents an illustrative system for gatheringtime-annotated web interaction and biometric sensor data of web pageusers to extrapolate emotional responses to a web page and generating anaggregated emotional map indicative of the emotional responses. Itshould be understood that any other computers implemented under thepresent invention may have different components/software, but canperform similar functions.

Computer system 1512 in computerized implementation 1510 is shown in theform of a general-purpose computing device. The components of computersystem 1512 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processorsor processing units 1516, a system memory 1528, and a bus 1518 thatcouples various system components including system memory 1528 toprocessor 1516.

Bus 1518 represents one or more of any of several types of busstructures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheralbus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus usingany of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and notlimitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture(ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA)bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, andPeripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Processing unit 1516 refers, generally, to any apparatus that performslogic operations, computational tasks, control functions, etc. Aprocessor may include one or more subsystems, components, and/or otherprocessors. A processor will typically include various logic componentsthat operate using a clock signal to latch data, advance logic states,synchronize computations and logic operations, and/or provide othertiming functions. During operation, processing unit 1516 collects androutes signals representing inputs and outputs between external devices1514 and input devices (not shown). The signals can be transmitted overa LAN and/or a WAN (e.g., T1, T3, 56 kb, X.25), broadband connections(ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM), wireless links (802.11, Bluetooth, etc.), andso on. In some embodiments, the signals may be encrypted using, forexample, trusted key-pair encryption. Different systems may transmitinformation using different communication pathways, such as Ethernet orwireless networks, direct serial or parallel connections, USB,Firewire®, Bluetooth®, or other proprietary interfaces. (Firewire is aregistered trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. Bluetooth is a registeredtrademark of Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG)).

In general, processing unit 1516 executes computer program code, such asprogram code for gathering time-annotated web interaction and biometricsensor data of web page users to extrapolate emotional responses to aweb page and generating an aggregated emotional map indicative of theemotional responses, which is stored in memory 1528, storage system1534, and/or program/utility 1540. While executing computer programcode, processing unit 1516 can read and/or write data to/from memory1528, storage system 1534, and program/utility 1540.

Computer system 1512 typically includes a variety of computer systemreadable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessibleby computer system 1512, and it includes both volatile and non-volatilemedia, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 1528 can include computer system readable media in theform of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 1530 and/orcache memory 1532. Computer system 1512 may further include otherremovable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storagemedia, (e.g., VCRs, DVRs, RAID arrays, USB hard drives, optical diskrecorders, flash storage devices, and/or any other data processing andstorage elements for storing and/or processing data). By way of exampleonly, storage system 1534 can be provided for reading from and writingto a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typicallycalled a “hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive forreading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk(e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from orwriting to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM,DVD-ROM, or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, eachcan be connected to bus 1518 by one or more data media interfaces. Aswill be further depicted and described below, memory 1528 may include atleast one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of programmodules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments ofthe invention. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium maybe transmitted using any appropriate medium including, but not limitedto, wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, radio-frequency (RF), etc.,or any suitable combination of the foregoing.

Program/utility 1540, having a set (at least one) of program modules1542, may be stored in memory 1528 by way of example, and notlimitation. Memory 1528 may also have an operating system, one or moreapplication programs, other program modules, and program data. Each ofthe operating system, one or more application programs, other programmodules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include animplementation of a networking environment. Program modules 1542generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments ofthe invention as described herein.

Computer system 1512 may also communicate with one or more externaldevices 1514 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 1524,etc.; one or more devices that enable a consumer to interact withcomputer system 1512; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem,etc.) that enable computer system 1512 to communicate with one or moreother computing devices. Such communication can occur via I/O interfaces1522. Still yet, computer system 1512 can communicate with one or morenetworks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network(WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter1520. As depicted, network adapter 1520 communicates with the othercomponents of computer system 1512 via bus 1518. It should be understoodthat although not shown, other hardware and/or software components couldbe used in conjunction with computer system 1512. Examples include, butare not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processingunits, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and dataarchival storage systems, etc.

As can now be appreciated, disclosed embodiments provide automatedtechniques for analyzing the effectiveness of user interface icons.Computer-implemented methods are used to assess a purpose/function of anicon or user interface button, and a corresponding function that resultsfrom selection/activation of the button. This can be used to quicklyidentify buttons that are not well suited for their function. Thisallows application designers to make changes/repairs to the userinterface to improve the user/customer experience with the application,resulting in reduced customer frustration and potentially increasingrevenue due to increased use/sales.

Some of the functional components described in this specification havebeen labeled as systems or units in order to more particularly emphasizetheir implementation independence. For example, a system or unit may beimplemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits orgate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips,transistors, or other discrete components. A system or unit may also beimplemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmablegate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices, orthe like. A system or unit may also be implemented in software forexecution by various types of processors. A system or unit or componentof executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical orlogical blocks of computer instructions, which may, for instance, beorganized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, theexecutables of an identified system or unit need not be physicallylocated together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored indifferent locations which, when joined logically together, comprise thesystem or unit and achieve the stated purpose for the system or unit.

Further, a system or unit of executable code could be a singleinstruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed overseveral different code segments, among different programs, and acrossseveral memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identifiedand illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in anysuitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure.The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may bedistributed over different locations including over different storagedevices and disparate memory devices.

Furthermore, systems/units may also be implemented as a combination ofsoftware and one or more hardware devices. For instance, locationdetermination and alert message and/or coupon rendering may be embodiedin the combination of a software executable code stored on a memorymedium (e.g., memory storage device). In a further example, a system orunit may be the combination of a processor that operates on a set ofoperational data.

As noted above, some of the embodiments may be embodied in hardware. Thehardware may be referenced as a hardware element. In general, a hardwareelement may refer to any hardware structures arranged to perform certainoperations. In one embodiment, for example, the hardware elements mayinclude any analog or digital electrical or electronic elementsfabricated on a substrate. The fabrication may be performed usingsilicon-based integrated circuit (IC) techniques, such as complementarymetal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), bipolar, and bipolar CMOS (BiCMOS)techniques, for example. Examples of hardware elements may includeprocessors, microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g.,transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integratedcircuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmablelogic devices (PLD), digital signal processors (DSP), field programmablegate array (FPGA), logic gates, registers, semiconductor devices, chips,microchips, chip sets, and so forth. However, the embodiments are notlimited in this context.

Also noted above, some embodiments may be embodied in software. Thesoftware may be referenced as a software element. In general, a softwareelement may refer to any software structures arranged to perform certainoperations. In one embodiment, for example, the software elements mayinclude program instructions and/or data adapted for execution by ahardware element, such as a processor. Program instructions may includean organized list of commands comprising words, values, or symbolsarranged in a predetermined syntax that, when executed, may cause aprocessor to perform a corresponding set of operations.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product at any possible technical detail level of integration.The computer program product may include a computer readable storagemedium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereonfor causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, may be non-transitory,and thus is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, suchas radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves,electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or othertransmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-opticcable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device. Program data may also bereceived via the network adapter or network interface.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofembodiments of the present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including an objectoriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, andconventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer,or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide areanetwork (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer(for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example,programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), orprogrammable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readableprogram instructions by utilizing state information of the computerreadable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry,in order to perform aspects of embodiments of the present invention.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a computer, or other programmable data processing apparatusto produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via theprocessor of the computer or other programmable data processingapparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified inthe flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computerreadable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readablestorage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable dataprocessing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particularmanner, such that the computer readable storage medium havinginstructions stored therein comprises an article of manufactureincluding instructions which implement aspects of the function/actspecified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

While the disclosure outlines exemplary embodiments, it will beappreciated that variations and modifications will occur to thoseskilled in the art. For example, although the illustrative embodimentsare described herein as a series of acts or events, it will beappreciated that the present invention is not limited by the illustratedordering of such acts or events unless specifically stated. Some actsmay occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts orevents apart from those illustrated and/or described herein, inaccordance with the invention. In addition, not all illustrated stepsmay be required to implement a methodology in accordance withembodiments of the present invention. Furthermore, the methods accordingto embodiments of the present invention may be implemented inassociation with the formation and/or processing of structuresillustrated and described herein as well as in association with otherstructures not illustrated. Moreover, in particular regard to thevarious functions performed by the above described components(assemblies, devices, circuits, etc.), the terms used to describe suchcomponents are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, toany component which performs the specified function of the describedcomponent (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though notstructurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs thefunction in the herein illustrated exemplary embodiments of theinvention. In addition, while a particular feature of embodiments of theinvention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of severalembodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more features ofthe other embodiments as may be desired and advantageous for any givenor particular application. Therefore, it is to be understood that theappended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changesthat fall within the true spirit of embodiments of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method for user interfaceevaluation, comprising: analyzing a computer program function associatedwith an icon, wherein the icon is a graphical element, included as partof a program, that when invoked, causes execution of the computerprogram function; determining a function type for the computer programfunction; analyzing the icon using image analysis; identifying objects,shapes, or colors based on the image analysis; comparing the identifiedobjects, shapes, or colors to a database of icons stored with associatedkeywords; determining a graphical element category for the icon, whereinthe graphical element category is derived from an analysis of underlyingmarkup code for the icon; obtaining graphical element category keywords;obtaining function type keywords, and a total number of function typekeywords; determining a number of matched keywords, wherein each matchedkeyword is both a graphical element category keyword and a function typekeyword; performing a consistency check between the graphical elementcategory and the function type; determining, based on the consistencycheck, a consistency score, wherein the consistency score is computed bydividing the number of matched keywords by the total number of functiontype keywords; providing a recommendation report regarding the use ofthe icon, based on the consistency score; in response to the score beingbelow a threshold, including a warning in the recommendation report;receiving a user override for a recommendation included in therecommendation report; and adding keywords associated with the functiontype to a database including keywords corresponding to a function of thegraphical element in response to a predetermined number of repetitionsof the receiving the override.
 2. The method of claim 1, whereindetermining the function type comprises performing a natural languageprocessing process to identify one or more function keywords.
 3. Themethod of claim 2, wherein determining the graphical element categorycomprises performing a computer-implemented image recognition process onthe graphical element.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprisingperforming a stylistic consistency check of the graphical element. 5.The method of claim 4, wherein performing the stylistic consistencycheck comprises performing a color analysis.
 6. The method of claim 1,wherein determining the graphical element category comprises performinga parsing of the underlying markup code.
 7. The method of claim 6,wherein the parsing of the underlying markup code comprises parsingbutton text.
 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the parsing of theunderlying markup code comprises parsing tooltip text.
 9. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising: accepting the user override for therecommendation included in the recommendation report; and recording theuser override.
 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising adjustingthe recommendation in response to receiving a predetermined amount ofuser overrides.
 11. An electronic device for user interface evaluationcomprising: a processor; a memory coupled to the processor, the memorycontaining instructions, that when executed by the processor, performthe steps of: analyzing a computer program function associated with anicon, wherein the icon is a graphical element, included as part of aprogram, that when invoked, causes execution of the computer programfunction; determining a function type for the computer program function;analyzing the icon using image analysis; identifying objects, shapes, orcolors based on the image analysis; comparing the identified objects,shapes, or colors to a database of icons stored with associatedkeywords; determining a graphical element category for the icon, whereinthe graphical element category is derived from an analysis of underlyingmarkup code for the icon; obtain graphical element category keywords;obtain function type keywords, and a total number of function typekeywords; determine a number of matched keywords, wherein each matchedkeyword is both a graphical element category keyword and a function typekeyword; performing a consistency check between the graphical elementcategory and the function type; determining, based on the consistencycheck, a consistency score, wherein the consistency score is computed bydividing the number of matched keywords by the total number of functiontype keywords; providing a recommendation report regarding the use ofthe icon, based on the consistency score; in response to the score beingbelow a threshold, including a warning in the recommendation report;receiving a user override for a recommendation included in therecommendation report; and adding keywords associated with the functiontype to a database including keywords corresponding to a function of thegraphical element in response to a predetermined number of repetitionsof the receiving the override.
 12. The electronic device of claim 11,wherein the memory further contains instructions, that when executed bythe processor, performs a natural language processing process toidentify one or more function keywords to determine the function type.13. The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the memory furthercontains instructions, that when executed by the processor, performs aparsing of the underlying markup code to determine the graphical elementcategory.
 14. The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the memoryfurther contains instructions, that when executed by the processor,performs a parsing of associated button text.
 15. The electronic deviceof claim 13, wherein the memory further contains instructions, that whenexecuted by the processor, performs a parsing of associated tooltiptext.
 16. The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the memory furthercontains instructions, that when executed by the processor, performs acomputer-implemented image recognition process on the graphical elementto determine the graphical element category.
 17. A computer programproduct for performing user interface evaluation on an electroniccomputing device, the electronic computing device comprising a computerreadable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith,the program instructions executable by a processor to cause theelectronic computing device to: analyze a computer program functionassociated with an icon, wherein the icon is a graphical element,included as part of a program, that when invoked, causes execution ofthe computer program function; determine a function type for thecomputer program function; analyze the icon using image analysis;identify objects, shapes, or colors based on the image analysis;comparing the identified objects, shapes, or colors to a database oficons stored with associated keywords; determining a graphical elementcategory for the icon, wherein the graphical element category is derivedfrom an analysis of underlying markup code for the icon; obtaininggraphical element category keywords; obtaining function type keywords,and a total number of function type keywords; determining a number ofmatched keywords, wherein each matched keyword is a both a graphicalelement category keyword and a function type keyword; and performing aconsistency check between the graphical element category and thefunction type; determining, based on the consistency check, aconsistency score, wherein the consistency score is computed by dividingthe number of matched keywords by the total number of function typekeywords; providing a recommendation report regarding the use of theicon, based on the consistency score; in response to the score beingbelow a threshold, including a warning in the recommendation report;receiving a user override for a recommendation included in therecommendation report; and adding keywords associated with the functiontype to a database including keywords corresponding to a function of thegraphical element in response to a predetermined number of repetitionsof the receiving the override.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein theicon is a mobile device icon.